Lethal injection was presumed to be the most humane execution method by the former Bureau of Corrections (BuCor) director Vicente G. Vinarao, who had proclaimed it to be the sole medium for carrying out the death penalty in 1997. Before the gurney, convicts were executed by electric chair, which is arguably more horrific. Death by electric chair required 3,300 volts that would burn flesh. It would fill the enclosed chamber with a foul smell and screams of agony from the condemned prisoner.
Now, the proposed bill had added death by hanging or firing squad to the list of methods of execution.
Theodore Te, human rights lawyer and current Supreme Court (SC) spokesperson, was the first to challenge the constitutionality of the death penalty in the high court. He is a staunch anti-death penalty advocate, as he had helped Leo Echegaray, the first prisoner to be killed by lethal injection, appeal his case in 1994.
“How many [convicts] do you have to kill before you can say, ‘O kita mo? Deterrent! Titigil ‘yong crimes (See? It’s a deterrent! Crimes will stop),” he argues, dispelling the notion that the bill will address high crime rates.
Echegaray’s was the first execution since 1976. Six other inmates followed. One was found to be innocent. Flaws in the justice system have led to the mishandling of death penalty cases. Judicial error rates reached as high as 80 percent.
It was 2006 when capital punishment was abolished by former President Gloria Macapagal-Arroyo and around a thousand death sentences were reduced to life imprisonment. A decade has already passed and the Duterte administration is now pushing for the return of the death penalty, being the first bill filed in the 17th Congress.
Unlike the previous law, major proponents of the bill introduced hanging and firing squad as alternative methods of execution. Heinous crimes such as plunder, rape, and treason were removed from the list of offenses punishable by death. Meanwhile, drug-related crimes remained.
As of this writing, the bill has already been approved in the House of Representatives and is now seeking approval from the Senate, which remains divided on the proposed bill. Approval from both chambers increases the odds of the bill’s passage into law.